jmtorres: movieverse Steve Rogers with dorky grin. Text: The future is awesome! Who else is a robot? (steve rogers)
jmtorres ([personal profile] jmtorres) wrote2011-11-26 01:16 pm

Oh my god

I cannot fix all the badfic and I should tamp down hard on the desire to TRY. Like, that one wasn't even badly written, it just could have been more interesting with a slightly different premise, and it was off a kinkmeme so you fill what you get asked, I get that.

AND I DID NOT NEED SLAVE!TONY IN MY HEAD ASKING FOR A BETTER STORY FML

ETA: Other things that freak me out about fanfiction: horrifying Tony with Steve/Howard. And like, the weird thing is, I'm pretty sure, based on the whole Carter legacy, that if Steve had slept with Howard it would turn him into an obsessed creepface about Tony, but I don't get the sense that fandom is drawing that parallel, I think fandom is just having its own personal id all over everything creepface issues. (I SAY THIS WITH LOVE. I AM NOT JUDGING YOUR CREEPFACE. MUCH.)

On the other hand, I think it would be really hilarious to horrify STEVE with Tony knowing about Steve/Howard. It was just one of those things--Dad bagged Captain America. (I am imagining Tony got told as a teenager when he started sleeping with boys and Howard was like "You think this is a rebellion? Let me tell you about my boyfriends, trust me, you're not rebelling against anything here," and frankly, Steve is HORRIFIED that the tale of their LOVE got used this way. Tony is like, "Whatever, I was pretty horrible as a teenager, I probably deserved it." Ahahaha, oh Tony, as a teenager you were horrible. Yes.)
melannen: Commander Valentine of Alpha Squad Seven, a red-haired female Nick Fury in space, smoking contemplatively (Default)

Re: Last extra comment, honest.

[personal profile] melannen 2011-11-27 02:14 am (UTC)(link)
Actually do you mind if I link to this conversation in my journal, or else start a top-level conversation about it there (linking/crediting you or not)? Because I kind of really want to bring more people into discussing this!

I think what I mean when I say "I am not writing this" is "I am making no commitments and I owe you nothing but let's talk about possibilities anyway." I don't think I'd use it with people who I thought had the power to pressure me in a way I felt uncomfortable? But thinking about how much that kind of thing gets used in a broader fannish context I sort of go ow. Because that's a lot of subtext and caveats going into that "no doesn't always mean no."

(Also I am kind of wondering how I have managed to entirely miss all of these slave!Tony badfics! Maybe my decision to only follow kinkmemes for quite small fandoms was a good one after all.)
melannen: Commander Valentine of Alpha Squad Seven, a red-haired female Nick Fury in space, smoking contemplatively (Default)

Re: Conversation elsewhere

[personal profile] melannen 2011-11-27 03:29 am (UTC)(link)
Ah, okay! I'll write something up to post maybe tomorrow, then, I think I am probably ready to be thick-skinned about this particular issue.

...you were around for that meta kerfuffle years ago about how all slashers are queer because writing slash is a sexual act, weren't you? Because on the one hand, no, we are talking about a bad Steve/Tony AU, it is not the same thing, but on the other hand, it is all a continuum, and also we are digging deep into our vulnerable places, and sharing them, when we do this, that's why these issues keep coming up.


...and I see, that explains it. When I ran out of first-run Steve/Tony recently I decided for some reason to instead start re-reading all of the Eroica fic on AO3. In chronological order, starting with the ones that were written in the 90s. And speaking of OMG THE CONSENT PROBLEMS. :P Either my memory has gone all rosy, or I really have gotten accustomed to much better treatment of this stuff in only the past three or four years since the last time I did that.
jackandahat: A brown otter, no text. (Default)

Re: Conversation elsewhere

[personal profile] jackandahat 2011-11-27 08:39 am (UTC)(link)
Heh - I'm a queer man, and for me the writing of fic is never political, and I hate it when people assume it is for me. It's interesting how far apart the experiences can be.

(I have one political fic, because it's about the experiences of someone growing up in The Troubles in Belfast. At the time I noted quite strongly that it was a departure for me!)
aris_tgd: Personal avatar Phumiko (Default)

Re: Conversation elsewhere

[personal profile] aris_tgd 2011-11-27 06:03 am (UTC)(link)
I think this conversation is at one remove for me because I don't see writing porn for people, even porn for their specific kinks, as a sexual action--because the way I approach fandom porn and the way I approach porn-I-use-to-get-off is completely different. Not that I don't think people use porn written for fandom as a way to get off? But since it's totally outside my sexuality (and women are pretty far outside my sexuality, I'm heteroflexible) it's a very weird thing to me to realize oh, this is hitting people in different vulnerable places than I have, where for me fanfic is mostly about ego.
aris_tgd: I feel like a Vorlon on its back--I can't get up and it's my fault! (amused at own stupidity)

Re: the nature of fannish porn

[personal profile] aris_tgd 2011-11-27 06:32 am (UTC)(link)
THIS MAY HAVE SOME RELEVANCE, YES.

It's not that I don't have fandom kinks! But they're the kind of kinks that make me go "Awwww!" and want to give someone a hug! Even when they're hardcore porn!
jackandahat: A brown otter, no text. (Default)

Re: Conversation elsewhere

[personal profile] jackandahat 2011-11-27 08:42 am (UTC)(link)
Just so you know, I've made a post that's tangenty to this. I've tried to make it as vague as possible - just referred to you as "someone I don't know very well" - and it is not an attempt to "gather evidence you were wrong" or something. It's me questioning my assumption/experience about people wanting to be enabled over writing.

So it won't bring anything down on you, but I thought it was polite to let you know it existed.
jackandahat: A brown otter, no text. (Default)

Re: Conversation elsewhere

[personal profile] jackandahat 2011-11-27 09:08 am (UTC)(link)
Yes please (And I appreciate you asking). I'm specifically asking "people I know", and people following links from elsewhere would throw that off. It's not meant to be part of this conversation - it's me going off on a tangent.
staranise: A star anise floating in a cup of mint tea (Default)

Re: Conversation elsewhere

[personal profile] staranise 2011-11-27 08:46 am (UTC)(link)
I feel like if someone asks a writer to write them something that hits a kink of theirs, that's a sexual interaction.

This really rings true to me. I definitely know that "omg write me [something] because that is SO HOT unf unf unf" makes me feel the same way that being asked to take off my shirt or whatever by an obviously lascivious person. They're asking you to perform an act that is all about their sexuality. Which isn't bad, not in either case--but it's not sexually neutral, either, and both circumstances make me uncomfortable if they're unwanted.
jackandahat: A brown otter, no text. (Default)

Re: the nature of fannish porn

[personal profile] jackandahat 2011-11-27 09:22 am (UTC)(link)
(All of this comment is about me. When I say "lazy writing" I am talking about my own experience, not accusing anyone else of being lazy)

I'm finding this fascinating because a couple of my fics that are other people's favourites are ones where I went "OK, I really don't do this (kink), but...". Because I had to get into the character's head and find out exactly what *they* found hot about it, whereas if they're doing something I know all about then yeah, it's probably a little lazier writing because it's more on the surface.

For example - I wrote a hand-feeding snippet. I really don't do that, I have issues with food, I'm still a little surprised I kept my brain at arm's length long enough to write it. But for those 20 minutes or whatever, it didn't matter that I didn't like it - I had to get in the boy's head and work out why he liked it, why it was so wonderful from his POV. And that came out on paper, and it's all him. More recently I did a bit involving gloryholes, I Do Not Get It... and yet it got a tonne of appreciative comments, because it worked for the character.

So writing stuff that's not about my ID seems to produce more interesting porn. Again, comes back to "Look how different people's experiences are", which is what's fascinating.
krait: a sea snake (krait) swimming (Default)

Re: the nature of fannish porn

[personal profile] krait 2011-11-27 11:24 pm (UTC)(link)
Your experiences seem more parallel to mine -- I get favourable responses when I'm writing something that doesn't appeal to me, and writingwise I mostly regard kinkmemes as a source of challenges in varying levels of difficulty, rather than the satisfaction of a personal desire.
jackandahat: A brown otter, no text. (Default)

Re: the nature of fannish porn

[personal profile] jackandahat 2011-11-28 08:07 am (UTC)(link)
Yeah - I read kinkmemes looking for my kind of thing (not in a "searching porn to turn me on" way, just looking for things I enjoy) but I read the prompts looking for something new.
jackandahat: A brown otter, no text. (Default)

Re: Conversation elsewhere

[personal profile] jackandahat 2011-11-27 09:17 am (UTC)(link)
This is now making me wonder about interpretations of requests. Because I have had people tell me "You should write [kink]", in a way that makes it obvious that they're after it because it turns them on, but I've also had people encourage me to write certain stories, which may or may not have been about turning them on. So now I'm wondering how my agreement that someone should totally write X because it would be awesome has been taken in the past. Hmm.

(A couple of years of putting up with certain people who would tell me things like they "had alone time" or "jumped [their] husband" after reading fic has left me oblivious to anything but anvils.)
staranise: A star anise floating in a cup of mint tea (Default)

Re: Conversation elsewhere

[personal profile] staranise 2011-11-27 09:33 am (UTC)(link)
I don't know if you've ever seen it, but I've definitely seen people leave comments on peoples' fic that say things like, "OMG, the way Bob jumped Pete was so hot! You should write a kidnapping fic where Bob has to rescue Pete and it's all so UST-y because he's remembering [blahblahblah]" and it's pretty obviously not about what the writer has written; it's about what the reader wants. And I think there should be boundaries around that--people should recognize that sometimes, that is your greasy id-issues. They're the kind of things that are actually subject to boundaries, even if it's just recognizing that your lustful ideas and the author's fic are not of the same part; they're separate.
jackandahat: A brown otter, no text. (Default)

Re: Conversation elsewhere

[personal profile] jackandahat 2011-11-27 09:45 am (UTC)(link)
Oh no, I absolutely have seen that - I've had that! I'm definitely not denying those exist, I'm wondering where the boundary is, but I think it's one of those "I'll know it when I see it". I just don't want to come off as skeevy if people are asking for suggestions, you know?
krait: a sea snake (krait) swimming (Default)

Re: Conversation elsewhere

[personal profile] krait 2011-11-27 11:13 pm (UTC)(link)
Like, there's extra bits of things, like if the writer posts that story publicly it's not JUST for the original requester, it becomes an interaction with multiple people, call it maybe exhibition or something, and it's, it's trading in more removed fantasies than like, direct cybersexing or whatever, but it is, actually, a sexual interaction to ask for/write a kink for someone.

Fascinating meta is fascinating! Not least because I have written for a kinkmeme (twice, and a very small one; it's not like it's a hobby), and also have read several (large, popular, long-running) kinkmemes. While I've evaluated them in terms of openness versus privacy, I've never considered this angle before.

Disclaimer: Subjective statement is subjective, and in no way intended to suggest YOU'RE WRONG! or that your experience is not valid! Just that my own experiences and perceptions are quite different.

For me, not even writing -- and at least once it was a pairing I'd never even have considered reading -- struck me as I-am-doing-a-sexual-thing. *shrugs*

In my head, I think I experience it as "it's all about fannish encouragement" (we all have kinks, you never know who shares your kink, and ANYBODY, not just BNFs, can write and be seen!) and, for me as a writer, it's about getting a bunch of no-pressure challenges, seeing what grabs me, and incidentally making somebody feel happy/accepted.

I don't really think of reading fanfic, even explicit fanfic, as a sexual thing, either, or at least not 98% of the time; it's an emotional high rather than a physiological arousal.