jmtorres: TOS Spock leans face on hand, has mild eyebrow raise. Text: seeking internally consistent logic since 1966 (trek)
jmtorres ([personal profile] jmtorres) wrote2009-06-07 10:08 pm

Out of curiosity

Can anyone explain the first thirty seconds of "Shore Leave" in a way that doesn't involve Kirk and Spock being totally gay for each other?



azurelunatic: slashgirl (slash character, symbol for woman) (slashgirl)

[personal profile] azurelunatic 2009-06-08 05:34 am (UTC)(link)
ahahahahahaaaaaaaaa

...maybe he was just surprised?
azurelunatic: Dying Spock saluting Kirk through heavy glass.  (spock)

[personal profile] azurelunatic 2009-06-08 06:00 am (UTC)(link)
Certainly expecting Spock.
azurelunatic: Vivid pink Alaskan wild rose. (Default)

[personal profile] azurelunatic 2009-06-08 06:10 am (UTC)(link)
Right. It's harder for him to get charged with sexual harassment when it's someone closer in rank...
niqaeli: a mage sheeping someone (sheep)

[personal profile] niqaeli 2009-06-08 07:14 am (UTC)(link)
Because TOS!Kirk was always so concerned about sexual harassment suits...

I mean, if that's the straightest reading we can come up with... well, okay, but it's not overwhelmingly *convincing*. *snerk*
azurelunatic: A red apple with a bite out of it, captioned in Star Trek font "What no-win scenario?" (what no-win scenario)

[personal profile] azurelunatic 2009-06-08 08:52 am (UTC)(link)
That Kirk was at least pretending to be straight; he almost got away with it. This one? Equal-Opportunity Intergalactic (sex-positive) Slut. :D
scy: (connection)

[personal profile] scy 2009-06-08 07:01 am (UTC)(link)
.....

Not that I know of, no.
feanna: The cover of an old German children's book I inherited from my mother (Default)

[personal profile] feanna 2009-06-08 12:35 pm (UTC)(link)
At this point I am honestly convinced that they WERE going for a romantic relationship for Spock and Kirk and just couln't have gotten it past the censors/ accepted by most of the audience.

http://allyourtrekarebelongto.us/prooflove.htm

http://allyourtrekarebelongto.us/spockette.htm

http://community.livejournal.com/spookysfics/13030.html#cutid1

http://community.livejournal.com/spookysfics/14113.html

I mean Gene Roddenberry has SAID that they were going for the Greek idea of love (like Alexander and Hephaiston) just without the sex. (yeah, no sex, we believe you, uhu.)
feanna: (star trek)

[personal profile] feanna 2009-06-08 12:46 pm (UTC)(link)
I mean to take just one of the examples from above: It's the late sixties, two man are alone and one tells the other that he's ashamed of his feelings for him. WHAT DO YOU THINK DOES THIS MEAN??????? (Think really hard it's not easy! Or is it?)
njordsifusansoo: (xwing)

[personal profile] njordsifusansoo 2009-06-08 04:30 pm (UTC)(link)
Kirk:
its been a long 3 months, and I've has heard of how good Spock is at giving back rubs. Spock just isn't getting the hint, and I don't want to sound gay, so I don't say anything when the Yeoman gives me a back rub instead. Hmmm, I never noticed how nice of an ass Spock has there.... It has been a long three months and am not gay! honest!
laurajv: Rock Out With Your Spock Out (rock out)

[personal profile] laurajv 2009-06-08 05:28 pm (UTC)(link)
No. I've never come up with another explanation for it.
aethel: (spock young)

not really, no

[personal profile] aethel 2009-06-09 03:00 am (UTC)(link)
Possible non-gay explanations:

1. They got bored during a game of chess early in the mission and decided to spend the rest of their lives messing with the crew. (Secretly, Kirk was using it as an excuse to get Spock into bed with him and--damn, still gay.)

2. In the future, everyone is omni-massageable? Star Trek is a utopia! No one minds a little man-on-man backrub (said Kirk, hoping to convince Spock).