jmtorres: Castiel speaking on his cell phone: "Even as we speak, it's... going... down." (supernatural)
jmtorres ([personal profile] jmtorres) wrote2010-02-24 03:26 am

and addition to what is and is not gen

I am really confused at how a story that is about several times Dean thought he was in love with girls he was fucking--I am really confused about how the author decided that was gen.
rydra_wong: Lee Miller photo showing two women wearing metal fire masks in England during WWII. (Default)

[personal profile] rydra_wong 2010-02-24 05:32 pm (UTC)(link)
There are certain older fannish circles where "gen" used to mean "everything that is not slash or NC-17 het". However, I'm surprised to find that in a recent fandom like SPN.

There are also some people who feel that "gen" does (or should) encompass stories which are primarily gen but have minor references to sexual relationships. But in this case, it sounds as if the relationships were the point of the fic, so ... I have no clue.
flourish: (Default)

[personal profile] flourish 2010-02-24 07:55 pm (UTC)(link)
Well, I mean, 'gen' does encompass stories which have minor references to sexual relationships - at least, to canonical relationships. I mean, if I write a gen fic about Mulder and Scully's kid, it will probably also reference the fact that hey! They had sex! Because otherwise how would the kid be there? They might even hold hands or something! But that doesn't necessarily mean I'd think of it as MSR, yknow. Actually, pretty much all kidfic is complicated like this, even fic that's about canonical kids. Because it often obligates you to treat the parents' relationship somehow, even if only by signalling that they're happy together in a subtle way, which can make some people feel like the fic's not gen...

Anyway. But of course yes to the "relationships the point of the fic" thing.