jmtorres: (FMA)
jmtorres ([personal profile] jmtorres) wrote2006-02-17 10:27 am

research notes--FMA alternate history--marriage

Does anyone know if Hughes ever flashes his and Gracia's wedding pics? I would dearly love to know if she wore a white dress. White dresses for weddings were popularized by Queen Victoria's wedding to Prince Albert; before then, people tended to buy a dress they could use as a fancy/formal evening gown later on. And does the world of FMA have a Queen Victoria? And would she have worn white?

ETA: Does anyone know what hand Hughes and Gracia wear their rings on? Germany's one of those weird countries where you wear it on the right hand, not the left; I wonder if Amestris is the same./ETA ETA2: The answer to that seems to be left hand, but I'm wondering if he didn't wear it when he was on duty, because the thing is so damn tricky to find./ETA2 ETA4: Heh. By complete and total accident (ie, changing my google prefs in the middle of image-searching Gracia), I discovered that "moderate safe search" blocks [livejournal.com profile] ponderosa121's site. Even though the Gracia pic she's done is not remotely risqué. But you know. We might find other things of nekkidity on her site. *snicker*/ETA4 ETA5: OMG, this is the scariest thing ever. BTW, why is Scar's brother called Bruce?/ETA5

ETA3: A lot of places have laws now that marriages have to be conducted in a public forum. (Australia is one that doesn't.) *ponder* /ETA3

Before about the 1540s, pretty much all marriages were common-law marriages. Apparently a lot of them did occur in churches out of expectations of family, but it was not required. Hell, witnesses weren't required. Specific vows weren't required. Marriage license, not required. You and your sweetie just agreed you were married, possibly with your parents' consent if you were like, 14.

In the mid-1500s, the church took an interest. Roman Catholic church started demanding its members have church weddings (not sure of the date on this one) and in England, there was a law passed that you had to be married by the CoE for it to be legal (unless you were a Quaker or a Jew).

But in Amestris... in Amestris... *taps lip* If the point of split is around 1500, and religion in Europe pretty much died, would the church have been in any position to demand... anything? I really wish I knew at what point Christianity kicked it, because it might be they had a last gasp and "OMG DO THIS" before they got squashed, and some pseudoreligous traditions may hang on in Amestris.

Even more interesting, the state interest in marriage really comes secondarily to the church interest, historically. The CoE thing was mid-1500s, but England didn't demand people get civil marriage licenses until 17something (in reaction to Fleet marriages--thousands of people getting married in Fleet Prison). Does Amestris give a damn about who marries who? Do you have to register with the state? Is there a state ceremony or certificate-signing or something? Does a civil servant have to preside? Can a military officer do it?

Traditions which are old enough to precede the split, and might still exist in Amestris:
--carrying wife over the threshold (Plutarch was analyzing the origins of this in the first century AD, and the conclusions are kind of icky; stuff like, reenactment of the Rape of the Sabines, or the woman only gives up her virginity when dragged into the house by her husband, or as a symbol of such fidelity that she enters the house carried by him and will only leave the house the same way)
--bachelor party (thought to originate with bachelor dinner in ancient Sparta)
--honeymoon (though possibly not as a "go someplace nice," just as a general period of romanticism)
--wedding cake (old, old tradition, involving cutting it with a sword)

Traditions probably not present that would have to have evolved parallel-ly in Amestris:
--bridal registry: The concept of a bridal registry was first instituted by Chicago-founded department store Marshall Fields in 1924, and has since been turned into a well-known experience of many large stores. (Drat, there goes the china patterns joke)
--that whole wearing white thing

Would love to hear further thoughts on this. *waves at flist*

[identity profile] kintail.livejournal.com 2006-02-17 08:20 pm (UTC)(link)
Right -- it's not complete equality in practice, men still outnumber women by a lot in the military, and being a housewife seems equality as acceptable... I wonder if that's the Japanese-target-audience influence, though: what little I know suggests that even as it becomes more acceptable for Japanese women to have a career, they're still expected to give it all up when they marry and have children if at all possible.

Women having their own businesses and careers would affect the way that property and inheritance laws are tangled in with marriage laws, I'd expect. I wonder if they have legal divorce, and what the social attitudes about it would be?

[identity profile] kintail.livejournal.com 2006-02-17 08:28 pm (UTC)(link)
Wow, seem me go all incoherent typo there. Being a housewife seems equally as acceptable, even. Which is still an incomplete thought, because there's the whole thing about equality shouldn't make choosing to be a housewife a bad thing as long as it's a choice, and so on, but my brain is going to mush.

[identity profile] jmtorres.livejournal.com 2006-02-18 01:02 am (UTC)(link)
because there's the whole thing about equality shouldn't make choosing to be a housewife a bad thing as long as it's a choice, and so on, but my brain is going to mush.

Heh. I know what you mean--I'm the one who asked the question, "Does Hughes get paternity leave?"

[identity profile] jmtorres.livejournal.com 2006-02-18 12:51 am (UTC)(link)
men still outnumber women by a lot in the military

And, more significantly I think, name me one female State Alchemist...

Women having their own businesses and careers would affect the way that property and inheritance laws are tangled in with marriage laws, I'd expect. I wonder if they have legal divorce, and what the social attitudes about it would be?

I have this theory that Pinako, the Leopard of Rizenbul, never married. Because she was free-spirited and wasn't getting tied to some man and was perfectly capable of running her own business and working her craft. (And because Grandpa Rockbell gets no mention at all.)

Which is not directly related, but... yeah. Hmm.

[identity profile] jmtorres.livejournal.com 2006-02-18 12:51 am (UTC)(link)
>>Leopardess. Looks like we're both up for the typoing!