F is for Freakjob, part II
Remember when I said we're like that in person, too?
This is a rough transcription, since it's from an in-person convo, not an AIM convo.
niqaeli: Okay, come here, there's something disturbing I have to show you.
jmtorres: Uh-huh. Are we talking urethra porn or balloons?
niqaeli: *starts cracking up*
jmtorres: Isn't it disturbing that we have reference points?
niqaeli: Isn't it disturbing that we have to ask? But no, closer to balloons. http://www.send2press.com/newswire/2006-03-0322-003.shtml
jmtorres: ...
niqaeli: Now let me show you the one with the better pictures!
jmtorres: ...
niqaeli: I'm sad that they don't have the posterior view.
davetheinverted: I've shown that to about five people and the reaction has been "... uh... wha... ..." It usually takes about twenty seconds for coherence to return. It's pretty impressive. It's rare that something gets that kind of consistent wtf.
jmtorres: I, you know, really the biggest question for me is, did Britney Spears agree to this? Encourage this?
davetheinverted: Well, she's a public figure, and it's art. What can she do?
jmtorres: No, I know but... as pro-life propaganda... wtf?
[a bit more on the idea of Britney Spears having to make the TERRIBLY DIFFICULT decision of whether to keep the child, and how rich she is]
niqaeli: I just feel sorry for the kid.
jmtorres: Yeah, someday that kid is gonna have to say, "Yeah, that's a statue of me coming out of my mother's vagina."
niqaeli: Oh, not just that. Just being the child of Britney Spears... I really do wish they had the posterior view on here, I'm CURIOUS.
jmtorres: Yeah, it's not like it's REAL porn. It's a statue!
niqaeli: Yeah, I'm not gonna get turned on by *Britney Spear's* vagina with a head coming out...
jmtorres: WINKING.
[Cue about a minute and a half of hysterical laughter]
niqaeli: Oh, god. My abs hate me. Do you know what a work-out hard laughter is?
jmtorres: I am controlling my heaving bosoms, largely with my left hand. I have to edit my post.
niqaeli: No, do a new one. You can traumatize more people that way--they'll be more likely to see a new one.
Et voila. *bows*
This is a rough transcription, since it's from an in-person convo, not an AIM convo.
niqaeli: *starts cracking up*
jmtorres: Isn't it disturbing that we have reference points?
niqaeli: Isn't it disturbing that we have to ask? But no, closer to balloons. http://www.send2press.com/newswire/2006-03-0322-003.shtml
jmtorres: ...
niqaeli: Now let me show you the one with the better pictures!
jmtorres: ...
niqaeli: I'm sad that they don't have the posterior view.
jmtorres: I, you know, really the biggest question for me is, did Britney Spears agree to this? Encourage this?
davetheinverted: Well, she's a public figure, and it's art. What can she do?
jmtorres: No, I know but... as pro-life propaganda... wtf?
[a bit more on the idea of Britney Spears having to make the TERRIBLY DIFFICULT decision of whether to keep the child, and how rich she is]
niqaeli: I just feel sorry for the kid.
jmtorres: Yeah, someday that kid is gonna have to say, "Yeah, that's a statue of me coming out of my mother's vagina."
niqaeli: Oh, not just that. Just being the child of Britney Spears... I really do wish they had the posterior view on here, I'm CURIOUS.
jmtorres: Yeah, it's not like it's REAL porn. It's a statue!
niqaeli: Yeah, I'm not gonna get turned on by *Britney Spear's* vagina with a head coming out...
jmtorres: WINKING.
[Cue about a minute and a half of hysterical laughter]
niqaeli: Oh, god. My abs hate me. Do you know what a work-out hard laughter is?
jmtorres: I am controlling my heaving bosoms, largely with my left hand. I have to edit my post.
niqaeli: No, do a new one. You can traumatize more people that way--they'll be more likely to see a new one.
Et voila. *bows*

no subject
O_o
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
*has totally died laughing*
*wishes she had people she could have this kind of conversation with, without getting smacked for it*
no subject
no subject
no subject
Also, age thing. It gets somewhat less scarydangerous to glomp people in person when you're older. (But you should still take precautions like meeting them in public with friends with you, which I totally did with
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
*While I dislike it, I do understand the desire to use "pro-life" as a noun: Unless one does so, there is no noun that directly corresponds, and consequently one cannot make the same sort of distinction as one can make between "socialism" and "the socialist movement."
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
I have no words (except for the three above, repeated loudly, and at length).
*traumatized for life*
no subject
no subject
no subject